Ph.D. Candidate in Economics (UAB & BSE) | Job Market 2025–26
Contact Me CV (PDF) JMP (PDF)
I am a Ph.D. candidate at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Barcelona School of Economics under the supervision of Professor Pau Milán.
My research interests are Organizational Design, Microeconomic Theory, and Industrial Organization. I am on the 2025-26 Job Market. I also collaborate with the Spanish Media Monitor project..
I visited Paris School of Economics hosted by Francis Bloch in the Springs of 2024 and 2025.
This paper explains why many organizations deliberately duplicate employee oversight—even for routine, verifiable tasks—and when doing so is efficient. I study internal monitoring when supervisors themselves can be bribed. The firm jointly chooses the architecture of oversight (how many supervisors per worker and how their spans of control overlap) and the incentives needed to keep supervisors honest. Overlap—assigning two independent supervisors to the same worker—makes it harder to hide wrongdoing and, crucially, lowers the wage required to maintain honesty; the resulting wage savings can outweigh the extra hiring cost. The analysis shows that redundancy is optimal when baseline verifiability is low or detection decays steeply with span; improvements in monitoring technology or stronger external enforcement shift the optimum toward wider spans with less overlap. The model predicts sorting: weak-verifiability environments sustain narrower spans and more redundancy, while strong-verifiability environments sustain wider spans and greater independence. By linking organizational structure to the credibility of enforcement, the paper reframes overlapping oversight not as waste but as a rational governance choice.
This paper builds a theoretical model of communication and learning on an engagement-maximizing social media platform, analyzing the algorithm it implements in equilibrium. As this algorithm overexploits user similarities and causes learning to vanish as platform size grows large, we explore alternatives. The reverse-chronological algorithm proves insufficient, so we construct the breaking-echo-chambers algorithm, which improves learning by promoting opposite viewpoints. Additionally, we analyze horizontal interoperability as a regulatory measure to align platform incentives with social welfare. By eliminating platform-specific network effects, interoperability incentivizes the adoption of algorithms that maximize user well-being.
I analyze a two-period model of political competition where voters care about candidates’ integrity. Candidates must trade off implementing their preferred policy against maintaining their electoral promises. Voters punish candidates that deviate from electoral promises by voting for their opponent. I find that punitive voting can exert political discipline only if candidates face low levels uncertainty about voters preferences. In this case candidates’ electoral promises are a compromise between their preferred policy and voters’ preferences, and when elected they implement their promise. Finally, I show that when one candidate’s ideal policy is closer to the median voter, an equilibrium exists where one candidate is disciplined and the other is not.
This paper investigates how competition shapes ideological slant in television news. While theoretical models suggest that increased media competition can either intensify or mitigate bias—depending on whether audiences seek confirmation or accuracy—empirical evidence remains limited. We address this gap by analyzing the entry of a new Spanish TV news outlet and measuring how it alters the political slant of existing providers. Our approach combines a formal model of political media markets with a novel empirical strategy that leverages large-language-model and text-analysis techniques. We disentangle media bias into topic selection, ideological tone, and airtime allocation—capturing the three primary channels through which slant manifests. Our findings offer the first direct evidence of how heightened rivalry influences not just audience composition, but the strategic editorial decisions that shape political coverage. Supported by a Google Cloud Research Grant.
This paper examines the optimal allocation of public procurement contracts in an oligopolistic competition framework. We build an oligopolistic competition model where a welfare-maximizing Government chooses optimal procurement allocation given its budget and needs. At the sectoral level, procurement leads to a rise in the aggregate productivity-to-markup ratio, enhancing sectoral real wages and overall output. However, the assignment of public procurement contracts modifies market dynamics by increasing the markups of awarded firms, thereby reducing their productivity-adjusted competitiveness. A key insight of our analysis is that, when viewed in isolation, awarding contracts to the most productive firms appears optimal. However, when considering sectoral outcomes, the optimal allocation depends on the relative elasticities of substitution within and across sectors and the productivity distribution. Under certain conditions, a more balanced distribution of procurement contracts across firms—rather than concentrating them in the most efficient firms—can lead to welfare gains. These findings underscore the role of procurement policy in shaping firm-level markups, market structure, and aggregate economic performance.
Email: manuel.lleonart@bse.eu
Departament d'Economia i Història Econòmica, Edifici B
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain)
